Eco-Innovation

4027657816_1d099d3f23_mLast week I was attending the presentation of the book Eco-Innovation written by Javier Carrillo, Pablo del Río and Totti Könnölä. I have not read them yet but the presentation includes an overview of the main contents and topics covered by the book, a sounds to cover most of the related with point subjects. I would like also to emphasize the speech of Mrs. Beatriz Yordi , head of Eco-Innovation unit of the European Commission, explaining the activities and initiatives the EC is addressing regarding this “hot” topic.

The event was also a nice opportunity to meet with professor Jesús Guerro, the IE expert on Reverse Logistic and the man who open my mind to the broad ranges of business opportunities behind that concept and their practice. As usual on the events organized by IE the cocktail and networking time after the presentation was really enjoyable.

Madrid Olympic City

MadridOlimpicSkyline

Is the smartphone going to become a commodity?

On the last conference I attend, SIMO Network in Madrid, I could enjoy Howard Rheingold presentation about “mobility as a key technology” with a lot of examples about the relevance of mobile devices and applications on our present and future lives. I obviously realized a gadget it seems is going to be everywhere, everytime attached to almost everybody is the smartphone. The omnipresence of the smartphone drives the device to become a commodity which implies the hardware evolution will follow the same path of other technological devices like the PC or the notebook, after a pre-paradigmatic stage an standard in the market set of features are established, followed by a price reduction race among hardware manufacturers complemented with performance enhancements.

SmartPhones

Other devices like notebooks and netbooks are also present on this battleground with a lot of innovation like the internet tablet by Archos. But besides the “gadgetry” view, today there are new factors to consider at present competition, I am speaking about how this devices are conceived, designed and manufactured. The relevance of the “wisdom of crowd“, the “open innovation platforms“, the “voice of customers” and openness in general are unquestionable new factors to consider.

The quick overview attached below and compiled by AnaBorg of today’s state of the art smartphones built in open platforms like Android shows the growing activity around that devices and openness:

The abundance of smartphone hardware platforms contributes to the widespread and improvement of open mobile platforms like Android or where under my point of view the future of movile devices and communications are. But this topic is out of the scope of this post …

Design Methods

DesignMethodI liked the post by the “Design council” regarding “Design methods“, but I think it is more a collection of  “New Ideas Generation” proceses that designs, nevertheless a nice package of tools to consider when addressing a new design project.

New Products Development: Implementation

This post outline several issues that are required to be analyzed with deeper detail and suggest some guidelines to implement an open platform for the development of new products under a collaborative environment. A review to the existing literature about theoretical knowledge and empirical experiences regarding virtual organizations, mention there is two principal roles, the business orchestrator and the team members. If you consider the project under an entrepreneurial approach, the participant seems to be the more feasible role, this allows to integrate our project into an existing networks building on our own  strengths and expertise, but if we have in mind a more academic perspective or we have in mind access to a big budget for implementation, the role of orchestrator is the one to consider. Along the post the orchestrator role is going to drive our thoughts.

“Closepen” approach

The open nature of the process, integrating a big number of actors like, potential customers, suppliers, designers, manufacturers, etc. some of them competitors among them on other projects, some of them with different interest on the project, place the platform in a sensitive situation. Is everybody able to contribute in the same way? Will be everybody granted with access to all the information? Is the platform or the management team able to handle a big number of people and enterprises? There is several questions like this that induces to consider an hybrid approach, open and close at a time, “closepen”. It will be one of the project goals to find out a balance between openness and control and this is a key value of the project hen defining the architecture of the business network, the participants and their reward mechanism.

Information Technologies Platform

There is no doubt IT is the tool that makes possible integrate at the lower transaction cost the people, companies and resources required to make possible this concurrent a collaborative way of develop new products, but IT is a broad territory to explore. Within this project we have to evaluate the existing collaborative software platforms and their suitabliness to the project, furthermore, to analyze the philosophy of the platform, issues like:

  • Build a complete new platform from scratch?
  • Integrate existing tools better suited to our product types?
  • Use open software or proprietary solutions?

Some existing tools we have to consider, evaluate pros and cons are:

  • Proprietary ERPs like SAP NetWeaver :

SAP_NetWeaver

  • Open code ERPs like Openbravo:

OpenBravo

  • Collaborative tools like Webex from Cisco, Basecamps or Groove from Microsoft:

CiscoWebex

Basecamps

OfficeGroove

The right way to evaluate the tools is verify if they can perform the business process the open platform we are developing requires.

Business Network Members

In fact we are defining what is called also a “virtual corporation” where some activities are considered “core”, usually they are the marketing or brand management, the R&D and the global management, in this case the orchestrator. Other activities are “critical” but not core, like sales, manufacturing and logistics, and other are only required like administrative, general facilities, etc. Along the project we have to review what activities and members fit into each category.

Regarding the nature of the products to develop we can define at a first glance the following core activities which could be addressed by a corporate team or core network member:

  • Marketing Team
  • Medical Team
  • Electronics Team
  • Materials Team

Along the project we have to detail the capabilities and expertise of the referred teams or network members.

Business Network Processes

Inspired by the Lean Design For Six Sigma techniques we have to define the relations among expert team members and network enterprises.

NPD_Stages

The project goal would be to define the activities flows among different teams or functional network members and how they are related with the collaborative tools we decide to use.

Innovative Reward Mechanism

There is a lot of contributors, and we have to evaluate non standard reward mechanism like dynamic allocation of shares ,  reputation, shared interest, etc.

I think a key success factor of the loose coupled network we are defining is the way the contribution of each member is going to be performed. All participants need to be committed with the project accordingly the relevance of their task and rewarded in the same degree. Some also innovative formulas could be considered, like:

“Liquid property”, this is to find a mechanism to distribute shares dynamically according the contribution of each participant. Something between the capitalist and cooperativist models.

“Sponsor an artist”, is a new way to finance new artist by joining through a website the required number of people to pay the disc edition. The rights of the song will be shared proportionally. Examples: “El cosmonauta” film and the saga “The lord of the rings”.

Open Platform for New Products Development

Current Situation

Major Complications

Proposed Solution

Succeed Metrics

New Products Development: Proposed solution

The difficulties outlined before could be diminish with the help of new technologies and enterprise practices that are gaining momentum today. The widespread of telecommunications and broadband, the virtualization of services, the acceptable level of performance of the knowledge management tools, the growing of enterprise networks, etc. are becoming tools the trigger the acceptance of a “collaborative” way to address problems and work in a “concurrent” way rather than linear.

Lets describe a little bit some of the key features the “new Supply Chain” we are proposing has to integrate.

InnovationProjectProposalOverview

Concurrent: The previously mentioned “linear approach” fits with the most usual up to day department structure of the companies, the fully independent units one, were inputs and outputs from a given department were clearly defined and planned in advance, “slowering” and “bureaucracing” the whole creation and development process because the mismatch of the input/output needs among different departments and the suboptimum solutions reached. The rational behind this is that the optimum of the whole chain is not the optimum of each stage. The concurrent approach is a more “collaborative” development process, were all the implied agents work together pursuing a global optimum. We have a practical example in the way the European Space Agency is facing the development of new satellites by the use of the Concurrent Design Facility.

The concurrent development practices will solve the lack of relevant information at different stages of the project and of different actors.

Open: Traditionally research and development activities were conducted inside the company, this is what is described by H.W. Chesbrough like the “close innovation paradigm”. The advent of several factors like the increasing availability and mobility of skilled scientist, the mature and widespread of venture capital markets and the increasing capabilities of external suppliers, leads to a new status where the silos approach was not the best fitted to address new innovation challenges and as Chesbrough highlighted the “open innovation paradigm” appears. We are in an abundant knowledge landscape where we can do a great work by searching and integrating external knowledge in new and different ways to create new products and services that fits our own particular goal.

The openness will contribute to integrate real customer needs from the early beginning, target niche markets and be open to existing solutions from all over the world and integrate the latest and more appropriate technologies.

Interactive and iterative: The development of a new product is a inherent trial and error process, and in the same way in the software development industry there has been a widespread transition from the “Waterfall model” (linear or sequential process) described before to the “Spiral model” (iterative process) we can translate this experience to other industries. The trick is to systematize in an agile way the traditional “trial an error” process, and their inherent learning nature.

Lean: We are designing innovative products that has to be  manufactured in a reliable, fast and cost effective way. This principles has to be accounted from the early beginning, this mean the pertinent Lean Design For Six Sigma tools has to be considered and integrated in the framework we are defining.

LDFS practices will be the way to an acceptable level of market performance at first attempt, which by the interactive and iterative nature of the process will led to an continuous improvement.

Virtual: The open nature of this new approach implies to join the effort of a big amount of people spread all over the world. Some like “WEB based” platform has to be used to integrate interaction and information flow. The approach of “virtual corporation” or “knowledge broker” relying on the intensive use of information technologies and knowledge management tools is a key enabler to implement the previously mentioned open and concurrent features.

Virtually is the key to minimize transaction cost, be agile and flexible to build custom supply chains to address a particular project.

Reward: The open nature of the approach means some clear and reward mechanism has to be conceived. There are several agent involved with different commitment. Reward has to be accordingly.

I think this new way to develop new product is going to be the main trend in the industry in the coming years, the earlier we start to apply this design practices into existing organizations or the new ones, the higher chance to be on a privileged position to address the market. The aim of this project proposal is to integrate all this factors in a unique model and give the design guidelines to build a software platform or configure an existing one to support this open design activities into a virtual framework.

Open Platform for New Products Development

Current Situation

Major Complications

Proposed Solution

Implementation

Succeed Metrics

New Products Development: Major complications

RayoUnder some circumstances, even what was highlighted as an advantage could potentially become a disadvantage besides the inherent inconveniences of working sequentially. Let’s consider the mere relevant ones:

Change on the requirements: Although ideally the design is “frozen”, the customer needs are really evolving because of two factors: first, the customer doesn’t specify clearly and completely what they want and second, competitor are proposing different and sometimes perceived better for the customer. The linear and siloed structure makes difficult to introduce changes on real time during the process.

Technology changes: At present days there are so many players that new technologies are available more often. It is highly risky to introduce a new technology during the development process of a new product without placed the project into a technical risk (if the promised solution is not so) into a planning risk (trials use to take more time than scheduled in advance) and into a financial risk (the former referred issues are strong capital consumers).

Process coupling: The linear structure assumes there is no coupling among functions, but real projects, real products use to be interdisciplinary and interfunctional in a way that a change into …. Although we have to strongly rely on modularity, until an industry has not maturate, which use to be the case of many innovative products, the interfaces that makes possible uncoupled modules are not well defined. Even at this stage customization sometimes requires a certain degree of coupling.

The “wicked problem”: This is, a problem whose requirements and limitations cannot be entirely known before completion.

Time consumption: To proceed in a sequential way requires to finish one stage before starting the next.  this produce an accumulation of delays that makes the overall

Real projects that develop real products has to face daily with that issues, and the result is that we do not get the best result a the first attempt and most frequently several iterations are required. The “time consumption” phenomenon gain relevance and a key success factor nowadays suffer, the “time to market”. The following factors drive new product development today:

  • Develop according real customer needs.
  • Short “time to market”.
  • Integrates latest technologies.

The drawbacks of the “linear” or “sequential” model outlined above makes really difficult to achieve that goals.

Open Platform for New Products Development

Current Situation

Major Complications

Proposed Solution

Implementation

Succeed Metrics



New Products Development: Current Situation

The “traditional” way to develop new products, both on mass and industrial markets and in a broad range of industries like electronics, sports, multimedia, etcetera rely on the  innovation and development capabilities of the “linear” Supply Chain. The sequence of business functions in which customer usefulness is added to the product, that is what we call since M. Porter the “value chain”, is performed by specialized departments according a “linear” flow.

CascadeLinearValueChain

The process as is today is based on the “waterfall” model where one proceeds from one phase to the next in a purely sequential manner and one should move to a new phase only when its preceding phase is completed and perfected. The main advantages of this procedure is the lower management effort, the task and responsibilities are clearly defined and the deliverables at each stage are well defined and done. This model implies also the requirements has to be fixed from the early beginning, this target “frozen” use to be a key enabler to speed up designs and implementations but what is an disadvantage could potentially become a disadvantage if the pursued target doesn’t fit with the best goal. This task responsibilities partition requires more documentation to make possible the interface among functional departments which implies more knowledge will be recorded and the integration of new member to the project is easier.

Open Platform for New Products Development

Current Situation

Major Complications

Proposed Solution

Implementation

Succeed Metrics


Open Platform for New Products Development

I am going to address an online  exercise, which is to define a supply chain architecture to accomplish in a novel way – open and collaborative – the “conception, design and manufacturing” of new  products. But what kind of products we are speaking about? Defined on this way the scope of the project is too broad, so with didactic purposes and based on a preliminary market research we are going to concentrate on products for a couple of   “promising areas”, the sport market and the health markets. Attached an examples of the type of products that fit the referred markets:

Products for the sports market

ZapaNike

Example: Nike’s  shoe with an accelerometer implanted  which measures distance and velocity and sends that data to an iPod nano.

Products for the health market

CamisetaElectrodo

Example: A jacket to wireless monitor electrocardiogram data.

All these kind of  products had a common base, they are based on the core capabilities of the multidisciplinary network of people and enterprises we try to integrate into what we call a “development platform”. The key members of the network or platform hold and strong knowledge on the following disciplines:

Wireless Sensors: Electronic devices that monitor physical parameters and spread them to where they are required by means of wireless transmissions.

Textronic”: Textiles and Electronics that gives new functional properties to materials.

Composites: Materials with inherent properties that can be controlled at design time and be tailored to the application.

Strange Diseases”: Doctors with expertise on how to address non common diseases.

Current Situation

Major Complications

Proposed Solution

Implementation

Succeed Metrics


The Harvard case ”Sothebys.com” under the Marketing and Operations perspective

Sothebys_AuctionThe analysis of a case can be addressed under several perspectives, the financial, the operational, the strategic, etc. The topic we are covering today, the Harvard case “Sothebys.com, will be adressed with focus on the basic principles of  Supply Chain and Marketing, nevertheless nothing is absolute and less in the enterprise world, so a multidisciplinary approach will not be forgotten.

The case and the facts related are dated on 1998 and 1999, we will consider that period of time along the write up although it is written in the middle of 2009, when it is really difficult remove from our minds the omnipresence and growing relevance of websites and business networks on the global economy.

”Sothebys.com” The strategic movement of a leader or just a fashions trend follower?

The relevance of Sothebys in the art, antiquities and luxury goods is unquestionable. Why this “traditional” house embraces the  internet revolution just in the  “dot com” hurricane crisis? The clue most probably rely on a careful look to the financial performance of the company, their operations nature and, undoubtedly, their competitors movements and market situation. Along this write up we like to analyze the financial situation of the company, where the revenues come from, where is the market growing. This implies to make the market segmentation of the antiquities and luxury goods auctions, the target market of the company and the way Sothebys is building the brand positioning. We would like to know why people is attending a Sothebys auction, what are the insights for purchasing and what are the intricate operations behind the transactions performed, the actors involved and their roles. Considering these factors all together we can conclude jumping into the internet arena was not only a good decision of the company but the “right” one if any.

Financial performance of Sothebys

Not always the strategy of a company is driven by financial targets but most frequently a change on the strategy is triggered by financial figures, perhaps this was the case of Sothebys. Looking the case financial data (Exhibit 1) we see that besides an increase on revenue of 16% from 1998 to 1999, the net income decrease 27%, but looking for additional data on the Sothebys annual report we confirm a dangerous trend, a new big long term debt, stagnation on sales and confirmed afterwards (not available on public data by early 2000, the case date, but most probably foresee by the top management) get into company losses.

FinandialData

Form 10-K, Annual report for the fiscal year ended 31 December, 2001.

The case also outlined on several places the low profit of most of the operations, the high cost of the catalog, etc. We will see later that operations were very complex and therefore expensive and we will see also the competitor pressure were strong, inside the business (Christies) and outsiders also (eBay). Something has to be done to improve figures. A careful review to the present market, to the nature of the operations and the changes on the competitive environment drives us to the convenience to open “online” auction services, this seems to be the worldwide trend, the virtualization of markets and seems to be the key to process optimization and address each customer segment in the more efficient way.

Market segmentation

Looking for the operational excellence and financial profitability, The presence of the company in the market has to be supported by the right brand positioning, this is way a clear market segmentation is required. The first segmentation variable it comes to our mind when thinking about the reasons a person buy an object in a Sothebys auction is the psychographic one, where lifestyles and peer-group identity play a major role. Considering this variable we found customers like collectors (of art or any other cultural thing),  early adopters of contemporary art, snobs, etc. Each of this people has a reason to participate and buy in an auction. Other variable to consider is a demographic one, the family income and educational and cultural background seems to dominate this variable. Within that we can consider university professors or art experts, for instance. The geographic variable also operates, don’t forget the Sothebys auction rooms are located in New York and London, contributing to a bigger business coming from USA and UK customers. This is a segment market the online auctions “Sothebys.com” is broadening but not eliminating because each regional area has their own cultural identity.

MarketSegmentsByCountry

Out of the date where the case is written but the left picture shows how most of the customers are coming from three countries. The product/object use/application also take part, consider for instance the purchase for a public museum or for a private collection, different purchasing behavior and budgets. Two key point have to be consider, one is that all these variables act together, not isolated, for instance, we can segment by “rich Chinese snob” or “medium class north American collector”, etc. The second point is how dynamic the segmentation has to be, the considered variables are evolving, specially on the present internet times, where sothebys.com is playing. This will led to a huge universe of market segments, each one with their own product/market opportunities. The usual way of plot this variables into a “positioning map” that simplify the aggregation of customers to be addressed in a similar way. The same clustering could be done with the object for auctioning giving us a graphical tool for segmentation handling.

Positioning_Map

A single pair of two dimension maps are not enough to describe completely the richness of objects and relevant customer segments but we can build several maps concentrating on the variables we consider pertinent using the positioning maps like a graphical data-mining tool. The key issue the map isolate is the strong difference of the ratio “number of items or transactions / hammer price” for certain type of goods or customers. There are a big potential of sales but with the present operations procedure they were out of the profit area. The idea behind sothebys.com is to address this new markets in a profitable way without compromise the brand positioning. Traditional brand means exclusivity, differentiation,  glamour … but the internet could open the door to the opposite brand values. How to solve the paradox of exclusivity and mass market? Matching customer segments with product segments and follow an hybrid approach.

Competitors

Competition is strongly related with the market segment Shothebys is addressing, but at a first glance we can indicate some active players on this arena; the traditional “high end” art and antiquities auction houses like Christies (London), Finarte-Semenzato (Milano – Italy) and Philips, de Pury (New York) and other substitutes to the live auctions that are playing successfully in the online world like eBay and other internet retailers like Amazon.

It is out of the scope of this work to perform a deeply study of competitors, but their presence indicates this is an attractive business and if we do not attend in the right way our customers (the segments we are already operating) or the potential customers (the new segments) the competition could find a way to do that. This implies no action is a dangerous action.

The main competitor in the live auction business is traditionally Christies, comparable on size, target market and reputation. Christies could easily open an online site, as in fact he did, and we can’t be a player out of this channel. The other competitors are far from Sothebys market share to be consider a thread in the short term, we are speaking about eBay.

eBay_Map

Regarding the “classic” auction site eBay, their scope is so broad and their customer base so heterogeneous that there are a clear room for a player in the art and antiquities specialized sector, this is the place for sothebys.com. Because we are going to enter the online auctions, it is a good practice to know what the main player is doing well in the business to imitate and where is down performing to avoid it. The activity map of eBay is depicted above where the involved agents and the products, information and knowledge flows are sketched.

There is some novel concepts that most probably explain the great succeed of eBay, besides the inherent to an auction “mechanism of price discovering”, the establishment of a “reputation index” brings the auction online a mechanism to establish trust among participants. This is something not implemented at sothebys.com but trust rely on the brand. That’s why it is so important the selection of the people who is going to attend customers at call centers (customer service agents), the specialist to solve inquiries and the selection of the “Associates”, they are key brand builders. Other relevant element introduced by eBay is the creation of a community. Sothebys.com address this topic creating the “Associates Network” which contributes also to reinforce trust and overcome the feeling among dealers that sothebys.com were cannibalizing their own business.

When to succeed on that market is required to increase the number of transactions, we have to know that this growing implies and exponential increase of the difficulties to manage the operations. Here is when we realize the advantage to rely on the expertise of the leader in that market and this is a key movement of Sothebys top management, establish an alliance with amazon.com, the worldwide leader of online trading, this movement convert a potential competitor on a reliable partner.

A new approach to operations

The case perform a detailed description of the agents, activities, goods and information flows involved into the “Live Auctions”. We are not going to repeat them here, but to depict graphically the operations process to make easier highlight the differences when comparing with the “Online Auction” process.

Sothebys_LiveAuction_Map

There are some characteristic unique of the live action process; all the goods to be sold are consigned to Sothebys and shipped to the headquarters in London or New York, carefully and detailed catalogued, public displayed and handled physically to the auction room. All this task are very time consuming and very expensive.  Other characteristic is the auction itself, it is a real time process that takes few minutes, if not seconds per item or lot. This bring us the concept of “buy-in” rate, around 30% which gives us a reference of the efficiency of the auction. The whole process is time consuming and expensive but is the one that provides the seller and buyer the feeling to be exclusive, to participate in a unique process, plenty of glamour and reliable, a process handle by a company we can rely on. This is where brand power comes into their own. Undoubtedly this is the way to market the kind of products with high value and few units addressed to the type of customer described during the market segmentation process. No question about that.

What about the thousands of objects that saturates the Shothebys machine? Remembering the case this is an activity mandatory at present, “to sell off the silver in order to get the Modigliani”, and the introduction of the “Online auctions” is perhaps the touchstone to handle that mess. Let’s take a look to the operations flow of “Virtual Auctions”:

Sothebys_OnlineAuction_Map

The first look suggest we added complexity, this is right regarding the information flows and the number of agents included (mainly the Associates) but not if we consider the daily operations once the whole mechanism is stabilized. Two main paths exists, following the case nomenclature, the “Physical Lots” and the “Dealer Lots”. Virtualization enables to make a big cost reduction on the most expensive task, produce and distribute the catalogues, and the often physical manipulation/transportation of the goods.

The more radical change was the integration of the Associates, this open to the possibility to handle the big amount of “minor” articles, gives also the possibility to customize the attention to a broader range of customers (geographically and psychographically) and  increase considerably one strategic and scarce resource for Sothebys, the specialist. Without the help of the Associates the specialists would be overloaded.

CRM at dot com

The “moment of truth”, when there is an interaction with the customer is exploding, becomes outsourced and the glamour around Sothebys is under risk, so all the effort to outperform has to be applied. A 24 hours call center was set up, the education and skills of the assigned agents is carefully selected, all the communications channels open (web, chat, forums, e-mail, telephone), a user friendly interface, with a careful web page design, not only the aesthetics and appearance, rather the interaction process and flow through pages and contents “navigation had to reflect the overarching purpose of the whole enterprise”, also the web page has to reflect the way people´s mind work, organically and associatively, not hierarchically (like programmers tend to do). Under this virtual and aggregated environment the volume and type of questions are predictable which allows to plan in advance capacity and pertinent solutions and answer to most frequent issues. The target is to provide a good customer feeling of the service and don’t lose at any “moment of contact” the glamour and excellence we expected from Sothebys.

Leverages

If we follow the novelties introduced by the new operations architecture we found some of them reinforced the other and act like leverages. For instance, the auction is not real time, the average duration is  a couple of weeks, this not real time auction enable to run simultaneously as many auctions we want and this continuous auctioning process means we can incorporate the buy-in lots into a new auction immediately.

A usual trick on services marketing is to get the customer perform some work, the “Dealer Path” got this trick not with the customer but with the Associate, he has to make the digital catalogue, promote the auction and collect the objects from the vendor and ship them to the purchaser.

The agent is also an specialist, an scarce resource, and participate in a network of Associates to avoid competition from them and avoid they felt Sothebys is cannibalizing their mown market.

Conclusion

Remember Sotheby’s main function is to serve as the intermediary between buyers and sellers of art, and this is what the tree channels does. But what makes possible the most profitable part of the business is the brand reputation of art expertise to proper value and the glamour around. Based on the right segmentation and the use of different market channels Sothebys solve the paradox of exclusivity and simultaneously mass trading while keeping the traditional positioning of Sothebys brand. Don’t forget every people has a different understanding of uniqueness and glamour and this is why there were arranged the three operating channels.

We are writing the case well after the publication date and we know what happens. We now present financial figures and they show the good performance of the company. Somehow the introduction of  the “Virtual Auctions” process contributes. Figures like 50% buy-in rates by reoffered immediately and 50% buy-in rate again support this believe.


Next Page »


Twitter Updates

Flickr Photos

ECO-INNOVATION

Presentación del libro: ECO-INNOVACION

Tarde de capea.

Invesnova en la EOI

More Photos